| THE
COSMOS - The Macrocosm (Or - Infinitely Intelligent Involution Before Initially Unintelligent Evolution - delivered in New York January 19th 1896) |
||
|
The whole mass of existence which we call nature has been acting on the human mind since time immemorial. It has been acting on the thought of man, and as it's reaction has come out the question: What are these? Whence are they? As far back as the time of the oldest portion of that most ancient composition the Vedas, we find the same question asked: "Whence is this? When there was neither aught nor naught and darkness was hidden in darkness, who projected this universe? How? Who knows the secret?" And the question has come down to us at the present time. Millions of attempts have been made to answer it, yet millions of times it will have to be answered again. It is not that each answer was a failure, every answer to this question contained a part of truth, and this truth gathered strength as time rolled on. I will try to present before you the outline of the answer that I have gathered from the ancient philosophers of India in harmony with modern knowledge. We find that in this oldest of questions, a few points had been already solved. The first is that there was a time when there was neither "aught nor naught", when this world did not exist; our mother earth with the oceans, the rivers, and mountains, cities and villages, the human races, animals, plants, birds and planets and luminaries, all this infinite variety of creation had no existence. Are we sure of that? We will try to trace how this conclusion is arrived at. What does a man see around him? Take a little plant. He puts a seed in the ground, and later he finds a plant peep out, lift itself slowly above the ground, and grow and grow till it becomes a gigantic tree. Then it dies, leaving only the seed. It completes the circle it comes out of the seed, becomes the tree and ends in the seed again. Look at a bird, how from an egg it springs, lives its life and then dies leaving other eggs, seeds of future birds. So with the animals, so with man. Everything in nature begins, as it were from certain seeds, certain rudiments, certain fine forms, and becomes grosser and grosser, and develops going on that way for a certain time, and then again goes back to that fine form and subsides. The raindrop in which the beautiful sunbeam is playing was drawn in the form of vapor from the ocean, went far away into the air and reached a region where it turned into water and dropped down in its present form to be converted into vapor again. So with everything in nature by which we are surrounded. We know that the huge mountains are being worked upon by glaciers and rivers, which are slowly but surely pounding them and pulverizing them into sand that drifts away into the ocean where it settles down on its bed, layer after layer, becoming hard as rocks, once more to be heaped up into mountains of a future generation. Again they will be pounded and pulverized, and thus the course goes on. From sand rise these mountains, unto sand they go. If it be true that nature is uniform throughout, if it be true, and so far no human experience has contradicted it, that the same method under which a small grain of sand is created, works in creating the gigantic suns and stars and all this universe, if it be true that the whole of this universe is built on exactly the same plan as the atom, if it be true that the same law prevails throughout the universe, then as it has been said in the Vedas "Knowing one lump of clay we know the nature of all the clay that is in the universe." Take up a little plant and study its life, and we know the universe. Applying this course of reasoning to phenomena, we find in the first place that everything is almost similar at the beginning and the end. The mountain comes from the sand, and goes back to sand, the river comes out of vapor and goes back to vapor; plant life comes from the seed and goes back to the seed; human life comes out of human germs and goes back to human germs. The universe with its stars and planets has come out of a nebulous state and must go back to it. What do we learn from this? That the manifested or grosser is the effect and the finer state the cause. Thousands of years ago it was demonstrated by Kapila, the great father of all philosophy, that destruction means going back to the cause. If this table here is destroyed, it will go back to its cause, to those fine forms and particles which combined made this form what we call a table. If a man dies, he will go back to the elements which gave him his body; if earth dies, it will go back to the elements which gave it form. This is what is called destruction, going back to the cause. Therefore we learn that the effect is the same as the cause, not different. It is only in another form. This glass is an effect, and it had its cause, and this cause is present in this form. A certain amount of the material called glass plus the force in the hands of the manufacturer are the causes, the instrumental and the material , which combined produced this form called glass. The force which was in the hands of the manufacturer is present in the glass as the power of adhesion (without which the particles would fall apart), and the glass material is also present. The glass is only a manifestation of these fine causes in a new shape, and if it be broken to pieces, the force which was present in the form of adhesion will go back and join its own element, and the particles of glass will remain the same until they take new forms. From this we find that the effect is never different from the cause. It is only that this effect is a reproduction of the cause in a grosser form. Next, we learn that all these particular forms which we call plants, animals or men are being repeated ad infinitum, rising and falling. The seed produces the tree. The tree produces the seed which again comes up as another tree, and so on and on; there is no end to it. Water drops roll down the mountain into the ocean, and rise again as vapor, go back to the mountains and come down again to the ocean. So rising and falling, the cycle goes on. So with all lives, so with all existence that we can see, feel, hear or imagine. Everything that is within
the bounds of our knowledge is proceeding in the same way, like breathing
in and out in the human body. Everything in
creation goes on in this form, one wave rising, another falling, rising
again, falling again. Each wave has it's hollow, each hollow has it's
wave. The same law must apply to the universe taken as a whole,
because of it's uniformity. This universe must be resolved into it's
causes, the sun, moon, stars, and earth, the body and mind, and everything
in this universe must return to their finer causes, disappear, be
destroyed as it were. But they will live in the causes as fine forms.
Out of these fine forms they will emerge again as new earths, suns,
moons and stars. Now we find that the fine forms slowly come out and become grosser and grosser until they reach their limit, and when they reach their limit they go back further and further, becoming finer and finer again. This coming out of the fine and becoming gross, simply changing the arrangement of it's parts as it were, is what in modern times called evolution. This is true, very perfectly true; we see it in our lives. No rational man can possibly quarrel with these evolutionists. But we have to learn
one thing more. We have to go one step further, and what is that?
That every evolution is succeeded by an involution. The seed is that
father of the tree, but another tree was itself the father of the
seed. The seed is the fine form out of which the big tree comes, and
another big tree was the form which is involved in that seed. The whole series of evolution
beginning with the lowest manifestation of life and reaching up to
the highest, the most perfect man, must have been the involution of
something else. The question is: The involution of what? What was
involved? God? The evolutionist will tell you that your idea that
it was God is wrong. Why? Because you say God is intelligent, but
we find that intelligence develops much later on in the course of
evolution. It is in man and the higher animals that we find intelligence,
but millions of years have passed in this world before this intelligence
came. This objection of the evolutionists does not hold water, as
we shall see applying our theory. You
may not see it, but that involved intelligence is what is uncoiling
itself until it becomes manifested in the most perfect man. That can
be mathematically demonstrated. If the law of conservation of energy
is true, you cannot get anything out of a machine unless you put it
in there first. The amount of work that you can get out of an engine
is exactly the same as you have put into it in the form of water and
coal, neither more nor less. There cannot be added in the economy of this universe one particle of matter or one foot pound of force, nor can one particle of matter or one foot pound of force be taken out. If that be the case,
what is this intelligence? If it was not present in the protoplasm,
it must have come all of a sudden, something coming out of nothing
which is absurd. It therefore follows absolutely that the perfect
man, the free man, the God-man, who has gone beyond the laws nature
and transcended everything, who has no more to go through this process
of evolution, of birth and death, that man called the "Christ-man"
by Christians, the "Buddha-man" by the Buddhists and the
"Free" by the Yogis - that perfect man who is at the end
of the chain of evolution was involved in the cell of the protoplasm,
which is at the other end of the chain. Related links - Vedanta Society at: http://www.vedanta.org
|
||
|
|